On 3 March 2014 00:38, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <[email protected]> wrote: > Control: tags 647474 + pending > Control: owner 647474 ! > > 2014-02-09 10:43 GMT+00:00 Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo > <[email protected]>: >> But as I also said, I think that the way in which Daniel Burrows >> solved this at the time is the wrong way and that should have accepted >> the "(verbose > 0)" from Ubuntu. I don't understand why he didn't, >> but I think that that's what we should do. >> >> [...] >> I still would like to solve this for the next release 0.6.8.5, better >> with the "(verbose >= 0)" than with the patch above. This is an >> unintrusive change that should not get in the way of wip-cmdline. > > Fix commited, with the verbose flag: > > http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=aptitude/aptitude.git;a=commitdiff;h=39803644412f7c99093744a2735f9acc495a583f >
Apparently you never figured out that the reason to show recommends-not-installed without --verbose is to alert the user to the "unusual situation" of their absence. _______________________________________________ Aptitude-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aptitude-devel
