>>>>> "MAFM" == Manuel A Fernandez Montecelo <[email protected]> 
>>>>> writes:

MAFM> If you are indeed using apt-1.1...

reportbug --template won't tell you that (a bug in itself!)

-- Package-specific info:
Terminal: xterm
$DISPLAY is set.
which aptitude: /usr/bin/aptitude

aptitude version information:
aptitude 0.7.2 compiled at Sep 19 2015 16:50:44
Compiler: g++ 5.2.1 20150911
Compiled against:
  apt version 4.16.0
  NCurses version 6.0
  libsigc++ version: 2.4.1
  Gtk+ support disabled.
  Qt support disabled.

Current library versions:
  NCurses version: ncurses 6.0.20150810
  cwidget version: 0.5.17
  Apt version: 4.16.0

aptitude linkage:
        linux-gate.so.1 (0xb77f7000)
        libapt-pkg.so.4.16 => /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libapt-pkg.so.4.16 
(0xb72cb000)
        libncursesw.so.5 => /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libncursesw.so.5 (0xb7295000)
        libtinfo.so.5 => /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libtinfo.so.5 (0xb7270000)
        libsigc-2.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libsigc-2.0.so.0 
(0xb7269000)
        libcwidget.so.3 => /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libcwidget.so.3 (0xb7165000)
        libsqlite3.so.0 => /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libsqlite3.so.0 (0xb7084000)
        libboost_iostreams.so.1.58.0 => 
/usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libboost_iostreams.so.1.58.0 (0xb706c000)
        libxapian.so.22 => /usr/lib/sse2/libxapian.so.22 (0xb6e65000)
        libpthread.so.0 => /lib/i386-linux-gnu/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0 
(0xb6e48000)
        libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6 (0xb6cd9000)
        libm.so.6 => /lib/i386-linux-gnu/i686/cmov/libm.so.6 (0xb6c8c000)
        libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libgcc_s.so.1 (0xb6c6f000)
        libc.so.6 => /lib/i386-linux-gnu/i686/cmov/libc.so.6 (0xb6ab7000)
        libutil.so.1 => /lib/i386-linux-gnu/i686/cmov/libutil.so.1 (0xb6ab3000)
        libdl.so.2 => /lib/i386-linux-gnu/i686/cmov/libdl.so.2 (0xb6aae000)
        libz.so.1 => /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libz.so.1 (0xb6a91000)
        libbz2.so.1.0 => /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libbz2.so.1.0 (0xb6a7e000)
        liblzma.so.5 => /lib/i386-linux-gnu/liblzma.so.5 (0xb6a54000)
        librt.so.1 => /lib/i386-linux-gnu/i686/cmov/librt.so.1 (0xb6a4b000)
        libuuid.so.1 => /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libuuid.so.1 (0xb6a45000)
        /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x80083000)

-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
  APT prefers experimental
  APT policy: (990, 'experimental'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 4.1.0-2-686-pae (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=zh_TW.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=zh_TW.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

Versions of packages aptitude depends on:
ii  aptitude-common           0.7.2-1
ii  libapt-pkg4.16            1.0.10.2
ii  libboost-iostreams1.58.0  1.58.0+dfsg-3
ii  libc6                     2.21-0experimental1
ii  libcwidget3v5             0.5.17-4
ii  libgcc1                   1:5.2.1-17
ii  libncursesw5              6.0+20150810-1
ii  libsigc++-2.0-0v5         2.4.1-2
ii  libsqlite3-0              3.8.11.1-1
ii  libstdc++6                5.2.1-17
ii  libtinfo5                 6.0+20150810-1
ii  libxapian22v5             1.2.21-1.2

Versions of packages aptitude recommends:
ii  aptitude-doc-en [aptitude-doc]  0.7.2-1
pn  libparse-debianchangelog-perl   <none>
ii  sensible-utils                  0.0.9

Versions of packages aptitude suggests:
pn  apt-xapian-index  <none>
pn  debtags           <none>
pn  tasksel           <none>

-- no debconf information

So I need to do

# apt-cache policy apt
apt:
  Installed: 1.1~exp12
  Candidate: 1.1~exp12
  Version table:
 *** 1.1~exp12 990
        990 http://ftp.tw.debian.org/debian experimental/main i386 Packages
        100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
     1.0.10.2 500
        500 http://ftp.tw.debian.org/debian unstable/main i386 Packages

to tell it to you.

But I don't want to downgrade, as it might mess up my system.

What would be more helpful would for you folks in the Debian Labs to
upgrade and see what happens. Thanks.

_______________________________________________
Aptitude-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aptitude-devel

Reply via email to