Control: tags -1 + wontfix Control: close -1
Hi, 2014-10-21 01:00 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson:
Package: aptitude Version: 0.6.11-1 Severity: wishlist No big deal, but in search, the hold covers up the fact that a package also has a ForbidVer. Maybe use big H in that case.
Since H is a strong form of "forbid-version" (Hold == Forbid all versions), or "forbid-version" a weaker form of Hold (Forbid-version == Hold it while candidate version is 1.2.3-4), I think that it's perfectly fine that H overrides F visually. In the cases where H is the one shown, it the behaviour overrides the one represented by the F. I think that using 'h' or 'H' for distinguishing which cases have also a Forbid all is unnecessary, since again, while H is present, F doesn't apply.
Or always clear the ForbidVer upon establishing holds.
That could be an idea, but not for the reasons of this bug report, and I don't consider doing it at this point. Cheers. -- Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ Aptitude-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aptitude-devel
