Your message dated Sat, 11 Jun 2016 14:12:55 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: www.debian.org: en and fr descriptions of
APT::AutoRemove::RecommendsImportant in aptitude manual are inconsistent
has caused the Debian Bug report #820436,
regarding www.debian.org: en and fr descriptions of
APT::AutoRemove::RecommendsImportant in aptitude manual are inconsistent
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
820436: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=820436
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal
For option APT::AutoRemove::RecommendsImportant,
https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/aptitude/ch02s05s05.en.html
contains:
Description: If this option is true, then aptitude will not consider
packages to be unused (and thus will not automatically remove them)
as long as any installed package recommends them, even if
APT::Install-Recommends is false. [...]
https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/aptitude/ch02s05s05.fr.html
contains:
Description : Si cette option vaut true, aptitude ne considérera
pas les paquets comme inutilisés (et donc ne les retirera pas
automatiquement) aussi longtemps qu'un paquet installé les
recommande, même si Aptitude::Recommends-Important a la valeur
false. [...]
i.e. the en version mentions APT::Install-Recommends while the fr
version mentions Aptitude::Recommends-Important.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
APT prefers unstable-debug
APT policy: (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1,
'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 4.4.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/12 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=POSIX, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,
2016-05-04 15:39 Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo:
Control: severity -1 wishlist
Hi,
2016-04-08 13:09 Vincent Lefevre:
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal
For option APT::AutoRemove::RecommendsImportant,
https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/aptitude/ch02s05s05.en.html
contains:
Description: If this option is true, then aptitude will not consider
packages to be unused (and thus will not automatically remove them)
as long as any installed package recommends them, even if
APT::Install-Recommends is false. [...]
https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/aptitude/ch02s05s05.fr.html
contains:
Description : Si cette option vaut true, aptitude ne considérera
pas les paquets comme inutilisés (et donc ne les retirera pas
automatiquement) aussi longtemps qu'un paquet installé les
recommande, même si Aptitude::Recommends-Important a la valeur
false. [...]
i.e. the en version mentions APT::Install-Recommends while the fr
version mentions Aptitude::Recommends-Important.
https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/aptitude/ch02s05s05.fr.html#configRecommends-Important
In other words, it's still supported and equivalent, but deprecated.
2016-04-08 19:56 Axel Beckert:
IIRC the French translation is only at the state of Aptitude 0.7.1
currently, i.e. could use an overhaul by some native French speaker.
This is indeed the main problem, although it goes much further back than
that, I had to put some screenshots in english because the french ones
were missing at least since 2012.
So if this doesn't improve and nobody steps in, at some point maybe the
only solution is to remove the french documentation package.
Well, so this is a matter of a translation being out of date. If french
translators or users do not care about this, there's not much that we
can do.
Disabling the translation/package would be an option, but the issue
highlighted here is minor in any case, because the old option is
equivalent to the new one, so we're not going to remove it just because
of that.
So closing this, no point in keeping bugs report about translations not
being up to date.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <[email protected]>
--- End Message ---
_______________________________________________
Aptitude-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aptitude-devel
