The first time I heard Van talk about ECN (and, I'm sure, something like RED), he said randomness was really important ...
Spencer On Tuesday, July 30, 2013, Michael Welzl wrote: > Hi, > > I like the slides too, but I think that slide #5 should contain: > - counteract synchronization > > This is in fact a goal of AQM that I had always considered to be one of > the key motivators behind RED (without that goal, it could probably have > just been ED instead :-) ). Somewhat strangely, this goal hasn't been > mentioned much recently. > > Is it just a simulation artifact? I don't think so. Yes we see it a lot in > simulations: > http://www.icir.org/floyd/papers/phase.pdf > but it also appears in reality: > http://caia.swin.edu.au/pubs/ATNAC06/Jaym.pdf > and it would surprise me greatly if it wasn't a much more significant > problem in more controlled environments, in particular data centers. > > Cheers, > Michael > > > On Jul 29, 2013, at 2:42 PM, Wesley Eddy <[email protected]<javascript:;>> > wrote: > > > As BoF chairs, we were asked to talk to the RTGAREA meeting > > at this week's IETF about the AQM BoF and what we're doing. > > > > The slides I'm planning to discuss there are: > > http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/87/slides/slides-87-aqm-3.pptx > > > > -- > > Wes Eddy > > MTI Systems > > _______________________________________________ > > aqm mailing list > > [email protected] <javascript:;> > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm > > _______________________________________________ > aqm mailing list > [email protected] <javascript:;> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm >
_______________________________________________ aqm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm
