Benoit Claise <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> I believe that draft-ietf-aqm-recommendation should contain the 
> recommendations from draft-ietf-tsvwg-byte-pkt-congest (basically the 
> section 2). This is the case now AFAICT. Then 
> draft-ietf-tsvwg-byte-pkt-congest could be referenced, informatively, if 
> someone wants to read the justifications behind the recommendations. 

   +1

--
John Leslie <[email protected]>
_______________________________________________
aqm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm

Reply via email to