Thanks. Please note the current version of the draft is: draft-ietf-aqm-recommendation-00
Diff here: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-baker-aqm-recommendation-02&difftype=--html&submit=Go%21&url2=draft-ietf-aqm-recommendation-00 ... and that when we did the last edits we tried to include text that relates to some of these comments. Fred & I WILL look at your comments and how they relate to the new draft revision and get back on the specific points you raise. Gorry > Hi All, > > Had some comments on Fred's document. I have added the comments as track > changes in a word document to easily see them. I used the 02 version. > > Thanks. > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > Scheffenegger, Richard > Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2013 5:02 PM > To: [email protected] > Cc: Fred Baker (fred) ([email protected]); Naeem Khademi ([email protected]) > Subject: [aqm] IETF88 Fri 08Nov13 - 12:30 Regency B > > Hi, > > this is just a simple remainder that the WG will convene also this Friday; > > As the mechanism update presentations took quite a bit longer than we had > expected - and we appreciate the discussion these presentations have > sparked - we agreed with Fred to have his presentation as the first agenda > point on Friday; the second agenda point will be a presentation around AQM > evaluation process and criteria. > > > The Room will be Regency B (3. Floor), and we will start at 12:30. > > > Best regards, > > Richard Scheffenegger > > _______________________________________________ > aqm mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm > _______________________________________________ > aqm mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm > _______________________________________________ aqm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm
