Hi Please note that ECN over LTE radio access is already standardized in 3GPP TS 36.300 (see 11.6 in http://www.3gpp.org/ftp/specs/archive/36_series/36.300/36300-c00.zip )
/Ingemar > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: den 21 januari 2014 08:38 > To: [email protected] > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [aqm] [tsvwg] Who supports tsvwg adoption of adding ECN to L2 > or tunnel protocols? > > Hi Bob, > > I support the issue being picked up by IETF. What can be done within the > bounds of IETF responsibility should be done. If ECN is seeing deployment, > especially ECN support for IP over VLAN over IP/MPLS may be of interest. > Further, ECN over LTE radio Access may be relevant (but my expertise is too > limited to judge details). > > Regards, > > Ruediger > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag > von Bob Briscoe > Gesendet: Montag, 4. November 2013 23:04 > An: tsvwg IETF list; AQM IETF list > Cc: [email protected] > Betreff: [tsvwg] Who supports tsvwg adoption of adding ECN to L2 or tunnel > protocols? > > Folks, > > Pls respond if you support this being adopted as a work-group item in the > IETF transport services w-g (tsvwg). The WG chairs need visibility of > interest. > Even better, if you're willing to read / comment / review / implement > > Guidelines for Adding Congestion Notification to Protocols that Encapsulate > IP <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-briscoe-tsvwg-ecn-encap-guidelines> > > Abstract > > The purpose of this document is to guide the design of congestion > notification in any lower layer or tunnelling protocol that > encapsulates IP. The aim is for explicit congestion signals to > propagate consistently from lower layer protocols into IP. Then the > IP internetwork layer can act as a portability layer to carry > congestion notification from non-IP-aware congested nodes up to the > transport layer (L4). Following these guidelines should assure > interworking between new lower layer congestion notification > mechanisms, whether specified by the IETF or other standards bodies. > > > [Cross-posting tsvwg & aqm, just in case] > > > Bob Briscoe, > also for co-authors Pat Thaler and John Kaippallimalil > > > __________________________________________________________ > ______ > Bob Briscoe, BT > _______________________________________________ aqm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm
