Hi Nicolas, Welcome aboard the team.
I recently shared a preliminary draft with the rest of the editorial team. The purpose of the draft was to gather thoughts in one place, iron-out the categories for evaluation, and provide a starting point to kick off discussions. I'll share that draft with you off-line. Many thanks, Preethi On 1/17/14 12:59 AM, "Nicolas KUHN" <[email protected]> wrote: >Hi all, > >I volunteer to act as editor & contributor to the "AQM algorithm >evaluation guidelines". I just joined the RITE project [0]. > >As explained in the email of Wes Eddy to the list [1], there was initial >work presented in Vancouver [2] and we will write a draft out of it. > >>> Submit AQM algorithm evaluation guidelines to IESG for publication >>> as Informational (Goal: July 2014) >>> - We need an editor team to step forward and begin work on this; >>> there was initial work presented in Vancouver, but no draft available >>>or >>> adopted by the working group yet. > > >A draft is coming really soon: we expect to send it by mid-February. > >Nicolas KUHN >IMT > >[0] http://riteproject.eu >[1] http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/aqm/current/msg00461.html >[2] http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/88/slides/slides-88-aqm-5.pdf >_______________________________________________ >aqm mailing list >[email protected] >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm _______________________________________________ aqm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm
