On Jan 18, 2014, at 7:14 AM, David Collier-Brown <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 01/17/2014 06:51 PM, I wrote: >> I've been reading through the internet-drafts, and one paragraph struck me >> as very illuminating. This is therefor a sanity-check before I go full-hog >> down a particular path... > > I have a longish set of comments for draft-ietf-aqm-recommendations-00, is it > best they go to the list as a series, or to a smaller group as one big wodge? If you haven't sent them in yet, I personally think you should. We're talking about finalizing the draft, and should get all known comments out of the way before that review. Send them to the list. > --dave > -- > David Collier-Brown, | Always do right. This will gratify > System Programmer and Author | some people and astonish the rest > [email protected] | -- Mark Twain > (416) 223-8968 > _______________________________________________ > aqm mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm If at first the idea is not absurd, then there is no hope for it. Albert Einstein
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ aqm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm
