Great, thank you Greg & Rong! On 2014-2-18, at 17:49, Greg White <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 11/8/13, 2:22 PM, "Eggert, Lars" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> On 08 Nov 2013, at 12:52, Greg White <[email protected]> wrote: >>> 3) Probably not directly. We have requested that Cisco update the PIE I-D >>> to include the updates to the core PIE algorithm made as part of the >>> CableLabs evaluation. CableLabs will draft an I-D to cover the remaining >>> gaps between that and what can be found in 1. I think this achieves >>> what >>> you are after. Let me know if not. >> >> That sounds like pretty good plan. >> > > > Lars, all, > > As per the discussion last November, I've completed and submitted a first > draft of the I-D describing the usage of the PIE AQM in DOCSIS 3.0 & 3.1. > > > Name: draft-white-aqm-docsis-pie > Revision: 00 > Title: A PIE-Based AQM for DOCSIS Cable Modems > Document date: 2014-02-14 > Group: Individual Submission > Pages: 14 > URL: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-white-aqm-docsis-pie-00.txt > Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-white-aqm-docsis-pie/ > Htmlized: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-white-aqm-docsis-pie-00 > > > I'm interested in feedback on the draft, please review and provide > comments. > > Best Regards, > Greg > >
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ aqm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm
