Ok, this is getting confusing, with two talks (also the one by Wolfram 
Lautenschlaeger) that were mentioned as *maybe* happening in AQM, depending on 
whether time permits, and else maybe going to ICCRG, when ICCRG is in fact 
scheduled *before* AQM.

So here's a proposal. We give both Wolfram (who we already agreed with about 
that, in fact) and Greg a 20 minute slot each in ICCRG, to present more 
details. Then, if time permits, *in addition* they *may* get a 10-minute chance 
in AQM.

Is that a plan?  Greg, this would mean that you'll *definitely* also present to 
ICCRG. ok?

Cheers,
Michael


On 24. feb. 2014, at 13:19, "Scheffenegger, Richard" <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> In order for Greg to give a quick overview of the changes between PIE and the 
> variant adopted by CableLabs for DOCSIS 3.1, a tentative slot was added to 
> the preliminary agenda.
> 
> For those interested in a more full discussion, there might be a slot at 
> ICCRG (preceding the AQM slot), where Greg could have a longer proper slot 
> for the presentation of that variant of PIE.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> 
> Richard Scheffenegger
> 
> 
> AQM Agenda
> IETF 89 in London, United Kingdom
> Tuesday, March 4, 2013, 14:20-15:50 BST (Sovereign)
> ******************************************************
> 
> WG status
> ---------
> 
> 14:20
> Agenda bashing
> AQM status
> Chairs
> 10 min
> 
> 
> WG items
> --------
> 
> 14:30
> draft-ietf-aqm-recommendation
> Fred Baker / Gorry Fairhurst
> 10 min 
> 
> 
> Charter items
> -------------
> 
> 14:40
> draft-welzl-ecn-benefits
> Gorry Fairhurst/Michael Welzl
> 15 min
> 
> 14:55
> draft-kuhn-aqm-eval-guidelines
> Nicolas Kuhn et. al.
> 45 min
> 
> 
> if time permits:
> 
> Algorithm Proposals
> -------------------
> 
> 15:40
> draft-lauten-aqm-gsp
> Wolfram Lautenschlaeger
> 10 min
> 
> 15:45
> draft-white-aqm-docsis-pie
> Greg White
> 10 min
> 
> _______________________________________________
> aqm mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm

_______________________________________________
aqm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm

Reply via email to