so the context is this large study done by Joao Taveira Araujo as part of his PhD with Richard G. Clegg, and partly reported in this paper: http://www.richardclegg.org/previous/pubs/rgc_icc_2013.pdf
In missive <[email protected]>, "Eggert, Lars" ty ped: >>--Apple-Mail=_23C6E70C-B35C-41A1-AAF0-FE2CAFABB5A5 >>Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable >>Content-Type: text/plain; >> charset=windows-1252 >> >>On 2014-3-21, at 22:27, Fred Baker (fred) <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On Mar 4, 2014, at 9:12 AM, Eggert, Lars <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> it looks like (in japan at least) TCP is very rarely controlled by = >>packet loss (dupack or timeout) but more by >>>>> sender or receiver rate limiting (or just being too short lived:) >> >>This was actually from a mail I forwarded for Jon. CC'ed him, since = >>you're discussing this. >> >>Lars >> >>--Apple-Mail=_23C6E70C-B35C-41A1-AAF0-FE2CAFABB5A5 >>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit >>Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" >>Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" >>Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail >> >>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >> >>iQCVAwUBUy1FN9ZcnpRveo1xAQLg9wQAl4PicOKz5eXJhU7jxin5UoKiREaZxKEK >>B94RSeWjDyCrANm6FHGPTW81t4T79x6ACS7DU/1MkNQgnTpWiSkAD729Q7TlliXO >>z0SVpeKfaX7MjbWhCVNOGz3VrJ/BHhVl4+SYTyVhoxV5bRgez0oZU9/vpq+MTk18 >>KbQH5uQna+o= >>=0miE >>-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >> >>--Apple-Mail=_23C6E70C-B35C-41A1-AAF0-FE2CAFABB5A5-- cheers jon _______________________________________________ aqm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm
