Hi, We posted an updated of the evaluation guidelines draft in order to facilitate the discussions during the AQM conference call on June 24th ( 3rd point of the agenda [http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/aqm/current/msg00658.html]).
Kind regards, The authors Begin forwarded message: > From: internet-dra...@ietf.org > Subject: New Version Notification for draft-kuhn-aqm-eval-guidelines-01.txt > Date: June 18, 2014 2:10:12 PM GMT+02:00 > To: Nicolas Kuhn <nicolas.k...@telecom-bretagne.eu>, "David Ros" > <d...@simula.no>, David Ros <d...@simula.no>, "Preethi Natarajan" > <prena...@cisco.com>, "Naeem Khademi" <nae...@ifi.uio.no>, "Nicolas Kuhn" > <nicolas.k...@telecom-bretagne.eu>, Preethi Natarajan <prena...@cisco.com>, > Naeem Khademi <nae...@ifi.uio.no> > > > A new version of I-D, draft-kuhn-aqm-eval-guidelines-01.txt > has been successfully submitted by Nicolas Kuhn and posted to the > IETF repository. > > Name: draft-kuhn-aqm-eval-guidelines > Revision: 01 > Title: AQM Evaluation Guidelines > Document date: 2014-06-18 > Group: Individual Submission > Pages: 25 > URL: > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-kuhn-aqm-eval-guidelines-01.txt > Status: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-kuhn-aqm-eval-guidelines/ > Htmlized: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-kuhn-aqm-eval-guidelines-01 > Diff: > http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-kuhn-aqm-eval-guidelines-01 > > Abstract: > Unmanaged large buffers in today's networks have given rise to a slew > of performance issues. These performance issues can be addressed by > some form of Active Queue Management (AQM), optionally in combination > with a packet scheduling scheme such as fair queuing. The IETF AQM > and packet scheduling working group was formed to standardize AQM > schemes that are robust, easily implemented, and successfully > deployed in today's networks. This document describes various > criteria for performing precautionary evaluations of AQM proposals. > This document also helps in ascertaining whether any given AQM > proposal should be taken up for standardization by the AQM WG. > > > > > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission > until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. > > The IETF Secretariat >
_______________________________________________ aqm mailing list aqm@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm
