Fred,
Just read it -- clear, easy to comprehend. I'd be happy pointing AQM newcomers
at it.
One nit: Might be just me, but the Acknowledgements section feels more like an
editorial/opinion. For a newcomer to AQM it wouldn't necessarily be clear how
the body of the I-D supports the expressed opinion.
cheers,
gja
On 06/14/2014 08:07, Fred Baker (fred) wrote:
I’d be interested in comments on this.
From: <[email protected]>
Subject: New Version Notification for draft-baker-aqm-sfq-implementation-00.txt
Date: June 13, 2014 at 2:52:07 PM PDT
To: Fred Baker <[email protected]>, Rong Pan <[email protected]>, Fred Baker
<[email protected]>, Rong Pan <[email protected]>
A new version of I-D, draft-baker-aqm-sfq-implementation-00.txt
has been successfully submitted by Fred Baker and posted to the
IETF repository.
Name: draft-baker-aqm-sfq-implementation
Revision: 00
Title: On Queuing, Marking, and Dropping
Document date: 2014-06-13
Group: Individual Submission
Pages: 14
URL:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-baker-aqm-sfq-implementation-00.txt
Status:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-baker-aqm-sfq-implementation/
Htmlized: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-baker-aqm-sfq-implementation-00
Abstract:
This note discusses implementation strategies for coupled queuing and
mark/drop algorithms.
Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
The IETF Secretariat
_______________________________________________
aqm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm
--
Professor Grenville Armitage
Director, Centre for Advanced Internet Architectures
School of Software and Electrical Engineering
Faculty of Science, Engineering and Technology
Swinburne University of Technology, Australia
http://caia.swin.edu.au
_______________________________________________
aqm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm
