On Jun 26, 2014, at 10:29 AM, Dave Taht <[email protected]> wrote:
> there some slides presented that I'd like to refer to as to the aqm > evaluation guide's directions that I'd like to see again. Link? > > As it is being broken up into an overview and a second document > detailing tests, I'd like people to look over the tests proposed in > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sarker-rmcat-eval-test-01 > > as a possible inspiration. While I like the above a lot, it bothers me > that it is only targeted at very low bandwidth scenarios (4mbit being > the topmost). I would expect that’s a bang-for-buck issue. The same problems happen at 4 GBPS that happen at 4 MBPS, but they have important differences. A session that moves a certain amount of data moves 1000 times faster, and you might have 1000 times as many parallel sessions, with the “law of large numbers” implications. > There are hopefully other tests proposed by other relevant working > groups (ippm, http 2.0, sctp come to mind immediately), that I'd like > to be aware of, and yet don't have the energy to sort through each wg > to find. If there is a way to get a list of tests each wg considers > important to work with, that would be a starting point. > > > -- > Dave Täht > > _______________________________________________ > aqm mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ aqm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm
