I like what I see here. I will have a few suggestions for the text after the (USA) holiday... On Jul 4, 2014 5:11 AM, "David Ros" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Dear all, > > After a long hiatus, we have finally posted an update to the TCP > evaluation suite. Comments are welcome. > > Besides mostly editorial fixes, the main changes wrt version -00 that > David Hayes presented in Berlin (*) concern parameter values for several > scenarios (some have been fixed, some have been added). > > (*) We just realised version -00 never got posted to the IETF datatracker, > so there was only a "privately-hosted" version online; we've just fixed > this omission. Our apologies. > > Thanks, > > David (as individual) > > > Begin forwarded message: > > > From: [email protected] > > Subject: New Version Notification for draft-irtf-iccrg-tcpeval-01.txt > > Date: 4 Jul 2014 13:50:53 GMT+2 > > To: Lachlan L.H. Andrew <[email protected]>, "Lachlan L.H. > Andrew" <[email protected]>, David Hayes <[email protected]>, > Sally Floyd <[email protected]>, David Ros <[email protected]>, "David Ros" < > [email protected]>, "Sally Floyd" <[email protected]>, "David Hayes" < > [email protected]> > > > > > > A new version of I-D, draft-irtf-iccrg-tcpeval-01.txt > > has been successfully submitted by David Ros and posted to the > > IETF repository. > > > > Name: draft-irtf-iccrg-tcpeval > > Revision: 01 > > Title: Common TCP Evaluation Suite > > Document date: 2014-07-04 > > Group: iccrg > > Pages: 34 > > URL: > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-irtf-iccrg-tcpeval-01.txt > > Status: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-irtf-iccrg-tcpeval/ > > Htmlized: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-irtf-iccrg-tcpeval-01 > > Diff: > http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-irtf-iccrg-tcpeval-01 > > > > Abstract: > > This document presents an evaluation test suite for the initial > > assessment of proposed TCP modifications. The goal of the test suite > > is to allow researchers to quickly and easily evaluate their proposed > > TCP extensions in simulators and testbeds using a common set of well- > > defined, standard test cases, in order to compare and contrast > > proposals against standard TCP as well as other proposed > > modifications. This test suite is not intended to result in an > > exhaustive evaluation of a proposed TCP modification or new > > congestion control mechanism. Instead, the focus is on quickly and > > easily generating an initial evaluation report that allows the > > networking community to understand and discuss the behavioral aspects > > of a new proposal, in order to guide further experimentation that > > will be needed to fully investigate the specific aspects of such > > proposal. > > > > > > > > > > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of > submission > > until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. > > > > The IETF Secretariat > > > > _______________________________________________ > iccrg mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/iccrg >
_______________________________________________ aqm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm
