I support this as a work-item. Gorry
> For reference, the draft is at: > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-baker-aqm-sfq-implementation-00 > > On 8/11/2014 10:25 AM, Wesley Eddy wrote: >> Based on feedback we've seen, it looks like there is significant >> value in progressing draft-baker-aqm-sfq-implementation as a >> working group document. >> >> Assuming there is WG consensus and we have AD-approval, we would >> like to add a milestone to develop this towards an Informational >> RFC within ~6 months. >> >> Please provide any comments, questions, support, or criticism for >> adopting this within the next few weeks. >> > > > -- > Wes Eddy > MTI Systems > > _______________________________________________ > aqm mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm > _______________________________________________ aqm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm
