"Scheffenegger, Richard" <[email protected]> writes: > * adopt the document draft-hoeiland-joergensen-aqm-fq-codel-01 as an > AQM working group item, heading towards publication as informational.
Well I'm obviously in favour ;) Still being fairly new to this process, however, could someone please explain to me the implications of publication as 'informational' (as opposed to, say, 'proposed standard'), and why this was chosen for this particular draft? In particular, what are the implications for the contents of the document from this? -Toke _______________________________________________ aqm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm
