Yup!
Loss is a bit of like hitting someone with a 2 x 4" as a clue-stick. It
hurts, but it sure does work!
--dave
On 02/27/2015 09:16 PM, KK wrote:
This could also be done by not having to depend on Œloss¹ as the primary
source of feedback...
On 2/27/15, 6:00 PM, "David Collier-Brown" <[email protected]> wrote:
IMHO, removing latency is the aim of FQ. Once done, buffer sizes can be
unbounded (save by price (;-))
--
David Collier-Brown, | Always do right. This will gratify
System Programmer and Author | some people and astonish the rest
[email protected] | -- Mark Twain
_______________________________________________
aqm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm
