I don’t think anyone is making that argument. ECN without AQM is completely pointless (what decides the marking rate?). AQM is good but it really kicks in when coupled with ECN.
-Vishal -- http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~misra/ > On Mar 27, 2015, at 4:17 PM, David Lang <[email protected]> wrote: > > > This is a better vs best argument. Nobody disputes that something like > fq_codel/pie/cake/whatever + ECN would be better than just > fq_codel/pie/cake/whatever, but the way this is being worded make it sound > that static buffer sizes + tail-drop + ECN is better than > fq_codel/pie/cake/whaever because these other queueing algorithms will cause > packet loss.
_______________________________________________ aqm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm
