On 23/04/2015 12:19, Mirja Kühlewind wrote:
Hi all,I know I'm too late for this but want to bring it up anyway: draft-ietf-aqm-recommendation-11 currently says: "An AQM algorithm that supports ECN needs to define the threshold and algorithm for ECN-marking. This threshold MAY differ from that used for dropping packets that are not marked as ECN-capable, and SHOULD be configurable." But I think it should be: "An AQM algorithm that supports ECN needs to define the parameters and algorithm for ECN-marking. These parameters MAY differ from that used for dropping packets that are not marked as ECN-capable, and SHOULD be configurable." so just s/threshold/parameters/ ...? I've just caught this now because I'm reading draft-welzl-ecn-benefits-02; sorry. Maybe it's still possible to make such a small edit... if other people think as well that this should be changed...? Mirja
We are indeed considering one very minor change to the wording here to prevent future confusion. Once we have text, we'll share with the WG to be sure this is acceptable.
Gorry & Fred _______________________________________________ aqm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm
