On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 3:03 PM, Roland Bless <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > Am 10.08.2015 um 15:43 schrieb Wesley Eddy: >> As chairs, Richard and I would like to start a 2-week working >> group last call on the AQM characterization guidelines: >> >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-aqm-eval-guidelines/ >> >> Please make a review of this, and send comments to the list or >> chairs. Any comments that you might have will be useful to us, >> even if it's just to say that you've read it and have no other >> comments. > > "Unfortunately", we (Polina and I) did a thorough review, > which is attached. TL;DR: from our point-of-view > the I-D needs a major revision.
I am so tired of this document that I can hardly bear to read it again, but I agree with the majority of the comments. Sometimes I do wish we could do graphics and charts as the IEEE does. > Regards, > Roland > > > _______________________________________________ > aqm mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm > -- Dave Täht worldwide bufferbloat report: http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/results/bufferbloat And: What will it take to vastly improve wifi for everyone? https://plus.google.com/u/0/explore/makewififast _______________________________________________ aqm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm
