On 10/9/2015 10:58 PM, David Lang wrote: > RFC3449 doesn't completely address the current situation, but it > provides a very good place to start, and it seems to me that the > solitions it explores to address the conerns that it (and you) raise are > actually being addressed pretty completely. There are still some areas > to talk about (ECN interaction for example) and we wshould be talking > about those issues rather than arguing that the proposal violates holy > writ.
I'm OK with the recommendations for the endpoints to modify their ACK behavior, but still am concerned that stripping out ACKs in the middle of the network is problematic for a number of reasons, only some of which are addressed in RFC3449 (which also recommends against deploying them in the general Internet, so if that's your justification then it's very clearly in direct opposition). Joe _______________________________________________ aqm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm
