Alia Atlas has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-aqm-fq-implementation-03: Yes
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-aqm-fq-implementation/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thank you for a clear and well-written draft. I would like to understand the reference of "Weighted Fair Queues" and have that clarified in the draft. It's a technical concern, but I have confidence that the authors and ADs will address it. 1) Sec 2.2.3 refers to "Weighted Fair Queues" as well as "Calendar Queues". Perhaps it is due to a lack in my recent background - but what's described is nothing like Weighted Fair Queuing (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weighted_fair_queueing). Do you have a reference for "Weighted Fair Queues" or something else in mind?? _______________________________________________ aqm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm
