Dear all,
Following Polina's comments on the goals of the document that are not clear, we
have clarified the link with the standardized algorithms and the goals of the
document.
Some highlights on the main changes:
"
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
1.1. Reducing the latency and maximizing the goodput . . . . . 5
1.2. Goals of this document . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
[...]
The goals of this document can thus be summarized as follows:
o The present characterization guidelines provide a non-exhaustive
list of scenario to help ascertain whether an AQM is not only
better than drop-tail (with BDP-sized buffer), but also safe to
deploy;
o The present characterization guidelines (1) are not bound to a
particular evaluation toolset and (2) can be used for various
deployment scenarios;
o The present characterization guidelines provide guidance for
better selecting an AQM for a specific environment; it is not
required that an AQM proposal is evaluated following these
guidelines for its standardization.
"
We hope that this clarifies the situation.
Kind regards,
Nicolas
-----Message d'origine-----
De : aqm [mailto:[email protected]] De la part de [email protected]
Envoyé : mardi 2 février 2016 16:10
À : [email protected]
Cc : [email protected]
Objet : [aqm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-aqm-eval-guidelines-10.txt
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Active Queue Management and Packet Scheduling
Working Group of the IETF.
Title : AQM Characterization Guidelines
Authors : Nicolas Kuhn
Preethi Natarajan
Naeem Khademi
David Ros
Filename : draft-ietf-aqm-eval-guidelines-10.txt
Pages : 35
Date : 2016-02-02
Abstract:
Unmanaged large buffers in today's networks have given rise to a slew
of performance issues. These performance issues can be addressed by
some form of Active Queue Management (AQM) mechanism, optionally in
combination with a packet scheduling scheme such as fair queuing.
This document describes various criteria for performing precautionary
characterizations of AQM schemes.
The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-aqm-eval-guidelines/
There's also a htmlized version available at:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-aqm-eval-guidelines-10
A diff from the previous version is available at:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-aqm-eval-guidelines-10
Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
_______________________________________________
aqm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm
_______________________________________________
aqm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm
