Thanks Wesley. fq_codel Internet draft- v4 addresses the question I raised and the text is clear now. Also, I implemented fq_codel in FreeBSD based on the fq_codel Internet draft- v04 and I got reasonable results.
Regards, Rasool Al-Saadi > -----Original Message----- > From: aqm [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Wesley Eddy > Sent: Friday, 5 February 2016 1:30 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [aqm] status of WGLC on fq-codel > > Hello, we started a working group last call for comments on this draft in > December: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-aqm-fq-codel/ > (this is the -03 version currently) > > Some comments were received since then, and Toke updated the > document: > https://kau.toke.dk/ietf/draft-ietf-aqm-fq-codel-04.html > (draft -04 version) > > I think this update addresses all of the comments received. > > I didn't see any feedback about document publication tracks (e.g. Standards > Track, Informational, Experimental, etc). We talked to the ADs briefly about > this, and I think we are comfortable with Experimental for this document. > That is the appropriate track if the AQM working group thinks this is safe to > deploy widely while experimenting with on the Internet (which I think is > consistent with what section 7 describes -- it has already been widely > deployed, though there are some items identified for future enquiry). So, I > think version -04 should be labelled with "Intended Status: Experimental". > > My plan is to complete the shepherd writeup for this document in the next > couple weeks, and if the editors push the -04 version of the draft, I think it > will be ready to proceed for AD review. > > Please shout if you have further comments. > > > > > _______________________________________________ > aqm mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm _______________________________________________ aqm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm
