Joel Jaeggli has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-aqm-docsis-pie-02: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-aqm-docsis-pie/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For my own edification I assume that the latency target is expected to fall within o LATENCY_LOW = 5 ms o LATENCY_HIGH = 200 ms. but presumably it's most usable at the bottom end of that range? why is the lower bound at 5ms? is it simply unreasonable to target below that or is it bounded by the resource contention of the subscribers. _______________________________________________ aqm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm
