Dave Cridland <[email protected]> writes: > Actually I'd read that as more of a recommendation than merely safe. I > think by safe, the authors mean that no significant harm has been > found to occur.
What we meant to say was something along the lines of "You want to turn this on; it'll do you good, so get on with it! You won't regret it! Now go fix the next 100 million devices!". The current formulation in the draft is an attempt to be slightly less colloquial about it... ;) -Toke _______________________________________________ aqm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm
