On 6/20/16 12:46 PM, Mirja Kühlewind wrote: > Hi Dave, hi all, > >> Am 02.06.2016 um 18:54 schrieb Dave Täht <[email protected]>: >> >> My own desire is to see more link layers - wifi, 5g, 6lowpan, homeplug, >> especially, explored with more implementations. There is also new stuff >> like threads, wifi direct/p2p, and this new ieee effort, >> http://standards.ieee.org/develop/corpchan/sfocus/index.html#std1c >> >> These are the growth nodes of the internet today, with special problems >> (non-duplex shared media with exponential backoff, handoff issues for >> mobility, packet aggregation (wifi, 5g), offloads (ethernet), that are >> only partially addressed by the aqm/fq technologies developed to date. >> >> To me this also requires tighter interfacing with the IEEE especially on >> new stuff like 802.11ad0, as well as 3gpp (5g) > > For me aqm that focuses on wireless networks is also an interesting topic > where a lot of work is going on.
Where? >The question is are people interested to bring this work to the IETF (writing >drafts) I think my points were more that the existing ietf work needed to be successfully exported. Somehow. >and is there enough energy in this group to finalize the work? Not me. I long ago ran out of funding to work on standards. Even if I had funding levels equal to the commitment, my energy and enthusiasm for any new paperwork is at a low ebb. I would much rather rejoin the vibrant dynamics of the open source world where the time difference between an idea and an implementation is merely a long sleepless weekend. If ever again I stumble across a techno-logic advance worth bringing in front of the ietf, I will do my best to sucker someone else into doing so. ;) > > Mirja > > > > _______________________________________________ > aqm mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm > _______________________________________________ aqm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm
