Kathy, Dave,
Thanks for the +ve comments!
On 08/04/2016 03:03, Kathleen Nichols wrote:
Nicely laid out and reported, but I have a question for the authors. At the
top of section II. D. it says:
"Instantaneous’ throughput is an approximation derived
from the actual bytes transferred during constant windows
of time."
Is the "actual bytes transferred" the sum of the packet sizes through
the link or is it the actual advance in sequence number bytes?
Simplistic sum of the IP payload lengths per unit time as seen at the
destination's NIC. (We took the line of least resistance for this tech report.
But yes, the advance of sequence num. per unit time would be a more precise
estimate of the useful flow of bytes as experienced by the application.)
cheers,
gja
thanks,
Kathie
On 8/3/16 6:37 AM, Dave Täht wrote:
I am especially grateful for the full documentation of how to configure
the bsd versions of this stuff, but the rest of the report was pretty
good too.
http://caia.swin.edu.au/reports/160708A/CAIA-TR-160708A.pdf
_______________________________________________
Bloat mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
_______________________________________________
aqm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm
--
Professor Grenville Armitage
Director, Centre for Advanced Internet Architectures
School of Software and Electrical Engineering
Faculty of Science, Engineering and Technology
Swinburne University of Technology, Australia
http://caia.swin.edu.au
_______________________________________________
aqm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm
