> On 12 Apr, 2018, at 2:23 pm, Mikael Abrahamsson <swm...@swm.pp.se> wrote:
> Again, I'm aiming to write up something about this for people to take to 
> replace their overbuffered FIFOs they might have towards customers today, not 
> produce something that is wonderfully great, but not widely supported in 
> current hw.

Yes, and that's a policy I can support (as far as it goes).  I'd much rather 
have, say, 100ms of bloat than 45000ms (which I've previously encountered).

 - Jonathan Morton

aqm mailing list

Reply via email to