> On 12 Apr, 2018, at 2:23 pm, Mikael Abrahamsson <[email protected]> wrote: > > Again, I'm aiming to write up something about this for people to take to > replace their overbuffered FIFOs they might have towards customers today, not > produce something that is wonderfully great, but not widely supported in > current hw.
Yes, and that's a policy I can support (as far as it goes). I'd much rather have, say, 100ms of bloat than 45000ms (which I've previously encountered). - Jonathan Morton _______________________________________________ aqm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm
