L.D. Best wrote: > > Clarence, > > I've seen mention of dropping the page frame, and wondered about why UBM > should be selected when NOUMB is the default. > > But when I go to Manifest it clearly shows that the page frame 64K is > placed *above* the 1Mb portion of memory. So getting rid of the page > frame wouldn't make any addition memory available for loading EPPPD > high. Hi L.D.; I think you must have misinterpreted the Manifest display. It definitely should go above the standard 640k low memory barrier but it must be placed in the first meg. - Clarence Verge -- - Help stamp out FATWARE. As a start visit: http://home.arachne.cz/ --
- (OT) memory management... was, Load EPPPD on COMPAQ 590 Glenn McCorkle
- Re: (OT) memory management... was, Load EPPPD on C... Clarence Verge
- Re: (OT) memory management... was, Load EPPPD on C... Michael L. Dawley
- Re: (OT) memory management... was, Load EPPPD on C... L.D. Best
- Re: (OT) memory management... was, Load EPPPD ... Richard Menedetter
- Re: (OT) memory management... was, Load EPPPD ... Clarence Verge
- Re: (OT) memory management... was, Load EPPPD on C... L.D. Best
- Re: (OT) memory management... was, Load EPPPD ... Clarence Verge
- Re: (OT) memory management... was, Load EPPPD on C... Glenn McCorkle
- Re: (OT) memory management... was, Load EPPPD on C... L.D. Best
