On Tue, 11 Jan 2000 17:13:34 -0400, Samuel W. Heywood wrote:
-------------snip----------
> Hello again, Roger:
> This seems like a very secure system. The disadvantage is that the code
> books having the secret instructions would have to be disseminated to each
> intended recipient by some secure means. The public key provides references
> to a particular set of secret instructions on how to assemble the ciphering
> wheels and gears for each transmission. Of course those who are not in
> possession of the secret instructions cannot decipher the message.
> The type of system used by SSL and RSA has the advantage of not requiring
> any method for secure transmission of any key or code book. For this reason,
> I cannot understand how RSA or SSL could possibly meet any high standard for
> security.
Sam .......we shipped those type of documents by accountability armed
couriers.....nowdays, YOU, with your encryption program, generate
your private key, and you NEVER send it anywhere...at the same time,
you generate your public key, and you send that.......
gregy
-- This mail was written by user of Arachne, the
Ultimate Internet Client
