I'm still catching up with reading all my mails, but I couldn't help
myself.... :)
On Friday, "Glenn McCorkle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed:
] There seems to be a vewry big diference in our experience with the
] speed of this list.
] Most times, my messages come right back to me in less than 30 seconds.
] That's right. 30 seconds.
Normally it takes anywhere from a few minutes to a few hours for me.
But that was back when I was using a redirector (which slowed things
down). If I was to CC between survpc, arachne and nettamer lists,
survpc would be straight away, arachne a little while later, and
nettamer ages. Anyway...
Looking in the headers it arrived here 14:24:41 Aust Eastern Summer
Time (+1100). If my maths are right, it took minus 19 seconds to get
here! So that means someone's clocks aren't accurate enough to time
this like this. <G>
Does it matter that I was about the 20th person who re-subscribed
when the listserv kicked us all off?
Since my POP3 and SMTP servers are located in different cities, I
will CC this message to myself and check the time difference.
] Received: from ns.arachne.cz (unknown [212.24.129.58])
] by mail.hotkey.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9932845AE
] for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 15 Jan 2000 14:24:41 +1100 (EST)
] Received: (from mail@localhost)
] by ns.arachne.cz (8.9.3/8.8.7) id EAA29330
] for arachne-list; Sat, 15 Jan 2000 04:25:43 +0100
--
| .~. | Hoody has the hots for whats in the box with the dots!
| /V\ | http://hoody.virtualave.net updated 14 Jan 2000
| // \\ | http://hoody.penguinpowered.com when I'm online
| /( )\ | ICQ: five oh one seven five one seven oh
| ^`~'^ | Carpe Aptenodytes!
Do witches run spell checkers?
| C607EUW | "We apologise for the inconvenience"
