Ron wrote:
> I'm unhappy to read in the list that at least someone thinks that "we
>won't notice the memory problem" when we're all on Linux.
I don't think we wount notice it - but it will most likely take much more
time before we see it. If a page for instance "uses up" 20K and you have
4MB free you'll need to reload that page roughly 200 times before getting
an error.
>Whatever sort
>of approach to reliable engineering is that??
Not good at all, but if it can help us then why not use it?
>PLease note that I'm not
>against Linux or its supporters (Steven et al).
I don't like it much myself (it do has it's benefits - being free is one)
but it's atleast better than the main-stream alternative.
//Bernie
http://bernie.arachne.cz/ DOS programs, Star Wars ...
