Mike,
Have to disagree with you here ...
On Tue, 02 May 2000 21:31:18 -000, Mike Millen wrote:
> True enough. (Though to be fair... it's not reasonable to say
> that JS shouldn't be used just because Arachne can't handle it,
> when the mainstream windoze browsers use it correctly).
<snip>
> If Arachne can't interpret JS then at the very least it should IGNORE
> the JS sequences and correctly display the rest... which the latest
> version still cannot do.
Arachne currently ignores some javascript and deals with some of the
other jsnit that's out there. If it didn't I couldn't use half the
places on WWW that I do.
Second, it is hardly fair to compare Arachne to "mainstream browsers"
when it is often NOT the browsers that handle problems but instead the
bloatware of WinXxxx they have to design around/under/over/through.
l.d.
--
-- "I need not like the company I keep, if that company helps me
attain my own personal goals and does me no harm." anon.
--
-- Arachne V1.61, NON-COMMERCIAL copy, http://arachne.cz/