Ricsi dearest,

Everything I say, unless it is in quotation marks or referenced
otherwise, IS in my opinion!  I don't blandly mouth the thoughts of
others.  That should have become apparent to you by now, after years of
reading what I write on the list.

When I say "I don't care" that means me.  I was very clear in what I
said.  "Neither one should be recommended if they both have the flaw of
failing to recognize ..."

Do you know what a decision block is?  I said IF ... I didn't say IMOUSE
couldn't do something, because I wouldn't say that about software I've
never tried.  

And, along with the fact that it wouldn't be nice to recommend
inflexible software, I don't think it's nice to recommend people visit a
mailing list where minds are closed and inflexible, where people see
only what they want to see, where "enemies" hide behind every pixel, and
where some people just seem to work unbelievably hard to find something
to get pixxed off about -- even if they have to invent that thing by
twisting the words of others.

And, to make this very clear to anyone who has any doubts, EVERYTHING I
SAY IS IN MY NOT SO DAMN HUMBLE OPINION!  If you don't like what I say,
don't read it!! 

l.d.

P.S.  To other members of the list:  My apologies for having to take up
your drive space with clarifications that should have been unnecessary.
=====

On Sat, 27 May 2000 09:33:06 +0200 (CEST), [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Richard Menedetter) 
wrote:

> Hi

> "L.D. Best" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> LB> I don't care how small IMOUSE or CTMOUSE is.  Neither one should be
> LB> recommended if they both have the flaw of failing to recognize where
> LB> mouse *really* is and insisting that mouse can only install on COM1.

> LB> A mouse driver with a teeny tiny footprint in memory is useless if it
> LB> lies about mouse detection and/or can install only on a hardwired comm
> LB> port.

> LB> It wouldn't be nice to recommend *any* software that is that
> LB> inflexible.

> LD You forgot the in _your_ oppinion !!!
> There are some other people in the world than LD Best ... :)

> BTW ...
> I never said, that IMOUSE is the best mouse driver around. (I said that it
> is the samllest I know ...)
> AND IMOUSE _CAN_ detect the port you are using.

> And IMHO you can tell cutemouse which port to use ... so there should not
> be any problems with that.

> In MY oppinion !

> LB> l.d.

> CU, Ricsi

> --
> Richard Menedetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ICQ: 7659421] {RSA-PGP Key avail.}
> -=> Assumption is the mother of all screwups... <=-

--
-- "I need not like the company I keep, if that company helps me
    attain my own personal goals and does me no harm."   anon.
--
-- Arachne V1.61, NON-COMMERCIAL copy, http://arachne.cz/

Reply via email to