Re: strange behavior in 1.61 with active links

[J J Young]

Bernie wondered:
>BTW: Is &rt; valid? (as a ">") It's (still) supported by Arachne but I
>don't think such an entity ever existed - Netscape 3.04 can't handle it.

-- I've never seen it published as an alternative to > --  > is
   the numeric alternative.

Regards,

Jake