Yes, Or, that thought had occurred to me, too.
But I find *so* many sites (upwards of a dozen) that classifying them
all by the specific bug involved would take too long. Perhaps if
the-powers-that-be were to use *certain* pages as "in house" tests...
Not that all things could be fixed *at once*, but at least we could
know the limits :-)
On Thu, 13 Jul 2000 14:15:14 +0200, Or Botton wrote:
> Here's an idea.
> Makeing a list of sites that do not work with Arachne, and not because
> of things like Javascript, but because of problems that should be
> corrected in Arachne itself.
> (This way we can -really- make some tests on what has changed on each
> new version.)
> Here's just afew of the sites:
> http://www.xoom.com - No site loaded
> http://www.cjb.net - No site loaded
> http://www.forum-film.co.il - Infinite loop (cold reboot required)
> http://www.email.com - Cant login with Arachne
> http://users.dal.net - (after login) side menu doesnt work with Arachne
> (CGI script error)
> Small problems (javascript):
> http://www.starmail.com (After login) - Javascript cant ID the browser
> http://www.thepalace.com - Javascript block the browser
> Or Botton
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> "Truth is stranger then fiction, since fiction has to make sense."
> -----------------------------
> http://members.xoom.com/dsdp/
---- Pete Randolph ----
---- Morristown Corners, Vermont ----
-- Arachne V1.64, NON-COMMERCIAL copy, http://arachne.cz/
