Bernie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On line 156 of adial.c:
> if(!strncmpi(value,"@PPPD.EXE",9) || !strncmpi(value,"@EPPPD.EXE",10))
>
> So you can have "Connection @PPPD.EXE" or "Connection @EPPPD.EXE" and
> pppdrc.cfg will be written. IMHO this should be changed into:
>
> if(strstr(strupr(value), "PPPD"))
>
> So now if your "connection" line had "pppd" in it pppdrc.cfg will be
> written, is anyone actually using pppd.exe (I have it somewhere but have
> never tried it) anyway this should work satisfactionally for everyone
> (or should it even be "ppp" ?
Looks like this should solve the problems that people were having with
"@lh" and "@epppdd". I'm not sure if Arachne (still?) has internal
support for "ppp.exe" (etherppp or Klos). I've tried all of these at
one time or another but have settled on epppdd.
>> @epppd.exe>>PPP.LOG
>> PPPD status: IP address set to 64.10.157.72 <== added by Arachne
>>
>> You can draw your own conclusions, but it looks to me like
>> "IP_Grab IP address set to" will only work with epppd.exe low.
>> and "IP_Grab ppp0: local" will work with epppdd.exe low or high.
>
> I think that everything will work once my patch is applied.
So once inside the loop, Arachne will add the "PPPD status:" line
to PPP.LOG, as well as updating pppdrc.cfg, if necessary.
Howard Eisenberger
Ottawa, Canada
--
DOS TCP/IP * http://www.ncf.ca/~ag221/dosppp.html
