On Mon, 11 Sep 2000 22:54:58 +0200 (CEST), [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Richard Menedetter)
wrote:
> Hi
> "Neil Parks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> BUT FAT is one of the worst (read THE worst) filesystem imagineable !
> It is simply a table which holds the information.
right!
> Modern Filesystems use a balanced binary tree. (HPFS, ExtFS2, even NTFS,
> .....)
> Access is MUCH faster, and clustersize=sectorsize !
Access IS faster but with DOS you can't use any of these Filesystems and
OS/2 is no alternative on a 386/486- Linux??
> NP> One disadvantage: MS-DOS 7 (at least as packaged with Win95) has no
> NP> DEFRAG. (There is a defragment pgm in Win95, but it requires Win95
> NP> to run.)
> Yepp ... maybe there are shareware alternatives.
Does anyone know such a"Defrag" for FAT32?
sacha
-- Arachne V1.66, NON-COMMERCIAL copy, http://arachne.cz/
