Michael Polak wrote:
>
> You argument about C vs. ASM is very funy.
>
> C *is* ASM.
Ha. (Another technical term) C is "C". Certainly not anywhere near "ASM".
> Additionaly, you can specify which variables in C code should be stored
> directly in registers, which means that some portions of the code will be
> translated to ASM exactly like if you wrote it in ASM directly.
Exactly ? Not in my lifetime. ;-)
> Additonaly, you can include ASM fragments to C code, but you are able to
> use symbols like variable names, variable addresses, jump labels or
> function names, so you can call C functions from inside ASM code, etc.
What you CAN do, and what people DO do, are two different things.
Do YOU have any inline ASM in Arachne ?
I knew you would take exception to that thread, and we BOTH know we
can't convert each other.<G>
- Clarence Verge
--
- Help stamp out FATWARE. As a start visit: http://home.arachne.cz/
--
