Now, I'm not too certain about Symantec ... but I trust the work Peter
Norton did, and why should DOS lie to me?
On Sun, 03 Dec 2000 11:46:33 +0100 (CET), [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Richard Menedetter) wrote:
> LB> <snip> I have my
> LB> RAM drive set with 512 sectors, but my HDD has sector size 2048 on the
> LB> primary drive, and temporarily 30K on the 2nd HDD.
> these are CLUSTERS
> FAT groups together sectors and forms clusters.
> So you have to administer less units.
> a clustersize of 8KB means that a cluster consists of 16 512 byte clusters.
Why, if what you say is correct, do all the programs I have show "sector
size" as whatever, and NOT "cluster" or "allocation unit" ???
I'm certain you're sure you're correct in what you say. But I think
somehow the terminology has gotten twisted. I'll eventually have a
FAT32 partition, and the software to work with it, so I'll find out
then... maybe
l.d.
--
Join B'FOR - B'mothers For Open Records
<a href=" http://www.b-for.org "> B'FOR web site</A>
[Associate members of triad also welcome; membership confidential.]
Every member counts! We need numbers to produce valid statistics.
*******
A proud member of
<A HREF="http://www.phenomenalwomen.com/"> Phenomenal Women Of The Web</a>
-- Arachne V1.67, NON-COMMERCIAL copy, http://arachne.cz/
