As far as I know, there is a Linux version of Real Audio that can play .ram
files.  So you don't need Windblows.

> DOS is dead. Live with it. Having a rough time with the fact, myself.

If DOS is dead, CP/M should have been dead a long time ago.  I was amazed by the
activity in newsgroup comp.os.cpm.  In contrast, there is less than one message
per day average on comp.os.msdos.mail-news.

>Power users need info. There aren't DOS apps for gathering it as it
>exists now, much less as it will be offered in 6 or 12 months. Witness
>all the technical documents in .pdf . Can't read it with GhostScript
>(Which, by the way, is largely considered unbuildable in DOS for current
>versions). Converted to .txt, the tables and diagrams are meaningless.
>Even the most enterprising DOS-only user can't WRITE a pdf reader
>because the spec needed to do it can't be read in DOS.

Is the spec a .pdf file?

One concern I have regarding DOS is whether it will be able to keep up with new
technologies, such as USB and IEEE-1394 aka FireWire.  I think DOS is already
unable to see anything past the 8 GB point on hard disks.  Anything for DVD?

There was a reference on the FreeDOS Web site to a commercial software support 
for USB in DOS.  There is apparently no XFree86 port to DOS.  There is a 
commercial X-Appeal X Window System for DOS costing $199 + shipping.  Clearly 
much more cost-effective than buying softwares like these is a set of Linux or 
FreeBSD CDs.  Open-source software is easier to come by for Linux and the BSDs
than for DOS.  Net-Tamer seems unable to compete on a large scale with 
open-source Unix Internet applications.

Caldera doesn't seem to want to go further with DR-DOS, but they keep it as a
money-maker for embedded systems.  DOS for embedded systems doesn't have to read
.pdf files, access USB or IEEE-1394 devices, or run big Web browsers.

>DOS is all I have. Viewing the current alternatives for OSes that have
>apps capable of using the unfortunate current data formats, I might
>simply choose to stay uninformed.

There are a lot of people who still don't have home computers.

Reply via email to