Bernie wrote:
>
> BTW: I've said this before (I think) - Glenn and Clarence, it's much faster
> to check the source for errors instead of debating about it ;-)
> //Bernie

Hehe.
That's a bit silly isn't it ?
If we just checked the source for errors and fixed them, (or pointed
them out) there wouldn't be any errors left would there ?
Don't you think Michael might have checked the source ?

No one has any idea where to look in this fairly voluminous source
until we debate a bit. <G> First we have to agree there is a problem,
and then get at least a vague clue as to what triggers it.

Isn't that why it was so easy for you to find that line of code ?
Thanks Bernie, for providing the info and potential fix to Michael. ;-)

Anyway, I hope that at least some find it a bit interesting.

-  Clarence Verge
--
-  Help stamp out FATWARE.  As a start visit: http://home.arachne.cz/
--

Reply via email to