Glenn,
Think I wasn't clear and/or you misunderstood ...
On Thu, 22 Feb 2001 01:51:03 -0500, Glenn McCorkle wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Feb 2001 15:15:40 -0500, L.D. Best wrote:
>> I am *very* much in favor of something like that. I routinely get
>> graphics from someone in California who uses OE, and 90% of the jpg
>> files are shown by his software as being /tiff
> Hi L.D.,
> If those attachments are arriving with let's say "image/jfif" as the
> content-type. *And* you are certain that they actualy are JPGs.....
They arrive wiht content-type as "image/tiff"
l.d.
-- Arachne V1.70;rev.3, NON-COMMERCIAL copy, http://arachne.cz/