Mel Evans, Registered Arachne User wrote: > > Surely that's part of the original HTML? If I size a gif and put it on a > webpage at say 110 x 245 and I then decide it's a bit big, I can re-size > it in the HTML with the img width and height tags. BUT! this does not > downsize the image itself which remains on file at say 3kb and still > takes the same download time even though it's perhaps 25% smaller. And I say surely this is either a misunderstanding or semantics. <G> This *DOES* downsize the image. IMAGE being what you see on the screen. It doesn't downsize the image FILE, but this is the point of the arguement. If we could save the image that is on the screen, to be perfectly clear - a video memory dump - just like all other screenshots - but without the black surround, and put the header on it for proper .BMP size, THEN we have resized the file.;-) - Clarence Verge -- - Help stamp out FATWARE. As a start visit: http://home.arachne.cz/ --
