Richard Menedetter wrote: > > And there are many, many cases where another algorithmus would REALLY > deliver more speed, and that independantly of the language. > (eg. a sorting algorithm that has O(ld n) is 'better' than one with O(n^2) > at least if the amount of data is big enough) True, the algorithm is important. Important enough that the ASM programmer should make the best choice the same as the "C" programmer. <G> - Clarence Verge -- - Help stamp out FATWARE. As a start visit: http://home.arachne.cz/ - The internet is infected - Windows is a VIRUS !! --
- Re: Arachne dying, lynx in good health? Bernie
- Re: Arachne dying, lynx in good health? Glenn McCorkle
- Re: Arachne dying, lynx in good health? Glenn McCorkle
- Re: Arachne dying, lynx in good health? Thomas Mueller
- Re: Arachne dying, lynx in good health? Glenn McCorkle
- Re: Arachne dying, lynx in good health? Clarence Verge
- Re: Arachne dying, lynx in good health? L.D. Best
- Re: Arachne dying, lynx in good health? Cristian Burneci
- Re: Arachne dying, lynx in good health? Clarence Verge
- Arachne dying, lynx in good health? Richard Menedetter
- Re: Arachne dying, lynx in good health? Clarence Verge
- Re: Arachne dying, lynx in good health? Glenn McCorkle
- Re: Arachne dying, lynx in good health? Howard Schwartz
- Re: Arachne dying, lynx in good health? Cristian Burneci
