Clarence wrote:
>> Just as it got interesting ;-)
>
>Actually, I thought I would bore YOU first. <G>
What? No, I *was* bored. But then we got to the good parts.
>I have sent you a copy of my latest exchange with Andy describing how to
>create the .com directly from the keyboard using DOS - without Debug.
So I noticed, you know you made a misstake in it don't you? A com and an
exe file are per say not diffrent. The com and exe formats are. A com file
can be a renamed exe file if you think back to what we discussed earlier on
this list. Picky? Me? Hmm... just a bit ;-)
Got to go watch some movie now... hmm... which one...? Browsing list of 99
movies.... ah... I'll just take one of them from the pile... ;-)
BTW: Wasn't there earlier some debate about the "new" (2 and a half years
old) pkunzip? I just remembered it, and I have used it ever since and not
had any problems with any ZIP files (except that they are ZIP files).
//Bernie
